Here, we used a cross-sectional structure to deal with the main matter out of relationship ranging from appears coverage and high blood pressure levels and therefore form of studies structure doesn’t help us make certain that coverage precedes the outcome, a condition to confirm an underlying cause-perception relationship. However, it’s unlikely you to definitely gurus that initial got high blood pressure levels were intentionally spent on practices to present large levels of audio coverage. , therefore the cross-sectional build didn’t help us thought go out while the a variable inside our study. However, given that contradict on their really works, we were capable show a connection even with zero advice time off coverage.
Completeness and you may quality of research try one of many constraints within our analysis. Studies were collected within the yearly necessary fitness investigations necessary for rules during the Brazil without regular quality control measures required by a technical browse was in set throughout data range. This might features influence not just the availability of the required variables but in addition the reliability of a few important information. Pros had been categorized due to the fact hypertensive during their regimen annual compulsory fitness evaluations according to one or two hypertension procedures pulled within a unitary occasion. Particularly method have authored a selection bias and you will misclassified match anybody into the hypertensive pros, leading to overdiagnosis and you may overmedication. On top of that, particular parameters typically relevant to help you high blood pressure, such as for instance socioeconomic level , which will mix up brand new studied relationship wasn’t compiled just like the the main annual review and were not available become looked at.